Why vote for Jody?

That is a simple answer to a complex problem. The simple answer is, “you vote for Jody because you want to re-claim your power and your right to have a say in what happens in your country.

The other side to that question is “why not vote for a major party?” If you can’t list three things your MP has done for your riding then re-think whether or not that MP is right for you.

I am learning that there are a vast number of people who do not want to be involved in politics outside of voting. Most of the issues we are facing today can be traced back to government overreach. The biggest concern I hear from the people I talk to has to do with ‘government corruption’. But government corruption can only happen when we do not get involved.

  • Stop voting for the ‘lesser of two evils’ only to be shocked when evil wins.

  • Stop ‘voting strategically’ to keep the other colour out. This means you are not voting for who you believe in. I would like to take this moment to remind you that you are not voting for a national party. You are voting for the ONE riding of Northumberland-Clarke. If you believe that one riding will make the difference then you have already lost. If the margin is that close then the Conservatives have already

  • Stop refusing to vote because ‘the system is corrupt’ and ‘we can’t change anything ,anyway’. You are among 60%-70% of eligible voters. Your non-vote is a vote for corruption. Your non-participation is participation. In reality, it is you giving permission for corruption to continue.

  • If you go in and return a blank vote of non-confidence, I get that. Hopefully I can restore your confidence in a short amount of time.

A vote for Jody is a vote for courage not fear….and courage is contagious.

It’s time to break the cycle.

Jody has always been fighting for you.

Full video of Jody at the mall fighting for your rights.
Watch Part 1
Watch Part 2

Full video of Jody fighting for farmers in the Netherlands
Watch

Why you should abandon

the party system

Mark Carney talking about using emergency powers. Last time invoking ‘emergency powers’ meant the destruction of small business. He will use emergency powers to “accelerate the projects we need.” What projects require emergency powers?

Mark Carney admitting that he works with politicians to create policies that he then capitalizes on through investing in companies that are about to profit from those same policies.

Copy of the Pfizer-Canada contract signed by Anita Anand in 2020. It states, “ Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the ‘Vaccine’ are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the ‘Vaccine’ that are not currently known.

This means three things.

  1. The “Safe and Effective” mantra was a blatant lie that gambled on your health.

  2. The government removed informed consent. The most sacred legal foundation of our medical freedom.

  3. Anita Anand knew and said nothing.

All 338 MP’s had the ability to gain access to this contract. Where were Pierre Poilievre, Elizabeth May, and Jugmeet Singh? Did they not care about the safety of the Canadian citizens? Do they not support the law of informed consent? Why did they not tell you that “Safe and Effective” was a lie?

Read the full contract here

But wait! There’s more!

As per the supreme court ruling, the MP’s don’t have to do what you say.
In the the People v. Wilton Littlejohn case it was determined that MP’s are not bound to adhere to the wishes of their constituents.
Read the court ruling HERE

Things to for us all to pondeR

Using the term “The Science is Settled” concerns me. Science is never settled. It is constantly evolving and to give a voice to only one side of any scientific debate will only result in dangerous outcomes. For me, it is not the science that needs to be questioned. It is the politicization of science that must be questioned. We are told that there is a climate emergency by leaders that have no problem using private jets to travel around the world as if Zoom calls hadn’t been invented.

If the science is settled. They why did 1983 respected environmental scientists from around the world sign the World Climate Declaration. Almost 2000 experts around the globe are in disagreement with the the “settled science.” Are they all to be discredited? Are they all to be accused of conflicts of interest? Or should the climate science debate be opened back up? Has the founder of Greenpeace lost his marbles?

Contact us

Stay up to date on Jody’s campaign? Fill out some info and we will be in touch shortly. We can’t wait to hear from you!